Using Water Quality Index and other criteria to Assess Drinking Water in Kastamonu, Turkey.

Authors

  • Idris Imneisi Water Technology, The Higher Institute for Agricultural Techniques EL-Marj, Libya.
  • Miraç Aydin Kastamonu University- Watershed Management, Faculty of Forestry-Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63359/ya3hsc17

Keywords:

kastamonu city, Water Quality, WQI

Abstract

This study aimed to determine Status of Drinking Water in Kastamonu City using Water Quality Index, Ammonia, Iron, Phosphate and Manganese of drinking water quality in kastamonu City-Turkey. For this purpose, Data collection based on the average of 120 of water samples were taken either at station (before treatment), or from station (after treatment) in kastamonu city between (2011-2015). The average concentrations of the Physicochemical Parameters Water in the kastamonu city (before and after treatment) for (ammonia (NH4-N), phosphate (PO4-P), iron (Fe) and magnesium Mn) averaged between (0.0313-0.026. 0.0522-0.0331 ,0.0473-0.0233 ,0.0512-0.0262 mg/l) respectively. Findings display that the physical and chemical quality (NH4-N, PO4-P, Fe and Mn) were considerably below the Turkish Water Pollution Control Regulation (WPCSR) and USEPA standards for drinking water quality in both station. The Water quality index (WQI) is valuable and special ranking to depict the average water quality status. The Water quality index shows that the (before treatment) a higher (WQI) of 31.50 at Good water quality grades as against 17.18 at Excellent water quality grades recorded in (after treatment) in drinking water of kastamonu city the results indicated the Situation of drinking water in kastamonu city was high quality.

References

Ahmad, A.B., 2014. Evaluation of Groundwater Quality Index for drinking purpose from some villages around Darbandikhan district, Kurdistan Region-Iraq. IOSR Journal of agriculture and veterinary science 7, 34-41.

Association, A.W.W., 2011. Water quality & treatment: a handbook on drinking water. McGraw-Hill.

Asuquo, J., Etim, E., 2012. Water quality index for assessment of borehole water quality in Uyo metropolis, Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria. International Journal of Modern Chemistry 1, 102-108.

Boyacioğlu, H., Gündoğdu, V., 2013. Efficiency of water quality index approach as an evaluation tool. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S 20, 247-255.

Brown, R., Mccleiland, N., Deiniger, R., Oconnor, M., 1972. Water quality index-crossing the physical barrier (jenkis,S Hed)Proc. Int. Conf. on water pollution research, Jerusalem6,787-797, pp. 787-797.

Chatterjee, C., Raziuddin, M., 2002. Determination of Water Quality Index(WQI) of a degraded river in Asansol industrial area(West Bengal). Nature, Environment and Pollution Technology 1, 181-189.

Dede, O.T., Telci, I.T., Aral, M.M., 2013. The use of water quality index models for the evaluation of surface water quality: a case study for Kirmir Basin, Ankara, Turkey. Water Quality, Exposure and Health 5, 41-56.

Imneisi, I.B., Aydin, M., 2016. Water Quality Index (WQI) for Main Source of Drinking Water (Karaçomak Dam) in Kastamonu City, Turkey. J Environ Anal Toxicol 6, 2161.

Mohsin, M., Safdar, S., Asghar, F., Jamal, F., 2013. Assessment of drinking water quality and its impact on residents health in Bahawalpur city. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 3, 114-128.

Organization, W.H., 2004. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: recommendations. World Health Organization.

Saeedi, M., Abessi, O., Sharifi, F., Meraji, H., 2010. Development of groundwater quality index. Environ Monit Assess 163, 327-335.

Wanda, E.M., Gulula, L.C., Phiri, G., 2012. Determination of characteristics and drinking water quality index in Mzuzu City, Northern Malawi. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 50, 92-97.

WHO, 2011a. Guidelines for drinking-water quality

WHO, 2011b. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality FOURTH EDITION.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2020

How to Cite

Using Water Quality Index and other criteria to Assess Drinking Water in Kastamonu, Turkey. (2020). Libyan Journal of Ecological & Environmental Sciences and Technology, 2(2), 48 – 54. https://doi.org/10.63359/ya3hsc17

Similar Articles

1-10 of 63

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.